被忽略的细节才是关键（关键就藏在被忽视的细节中）

Considering user intent in Chinese

The user shared a thought in Chinese about overlooked details being key. I think they might be making a philosophical statement. In the context of coding, they could be looking for help or wanting to make a point about reviewing code or debugging. I should respond in a friendly tone and ask for clarification. Are they talking about a specific issue? I could also suggest ways to surface those overlooked details with various coding practices like checklists and tests.Planning a concise response

I'm thinking about how to respond to the user's message mentioning the "Plan tool". It seems we should avoid heavy formatting since it's a conversational reply. I should ask what specific area they're referring to, like code, product, data, or operations. Providing a compact checklist to catch overlooked details could help. I might suggest reviewing a specific file or test case. Also, I can prepare a short list of common oversights and practical steps to address them. I'll aim for a clear response in Chinese.Crafting a concise response in Chinese

I’ll start with a brief agreement: “同感。往往决定成败的就是那些小处。” Then I’ll ask if they're referring to specific code, requirements, or an issue. I think it’s important to provide a punchy checklist of around 4–6 key areas where details might be overlooked, like boundary conditions, error handling, or security.

After that, I’ll suggest practical steps, such as creating a failed checklist or using linters and property-based testing, and conclude with: “如果你有具体文件或故障，我可以帮你列出风险点或加测试。要从哪里开始？” I'll keep it all straightforward and in plain text.